Introduction
Build a distributed file system with data replication, leader election via Raft consensus, and fault tolerance. This comprehensive guide covers everything from design through implementation, testing, and deployment.
Build a distributed file system with data replication, leader election via Raft consensus, and fault tolerance.
Build a distributed file system with data replication, leader election via Raft consensus, and fault tolerance. This comprehensive guide covers everything from design through implementation, testing, and deployment.
CAP Theorem: distributed systems can guarantee at most two of: Consistency (all nodes see same data), Availability (system responds to all requests), Partition tolerance (continues despite network splits). Network partitions are inevitable in distributed systems, so choose CP (consistent, may refuse requests during partition — like ZooKeeper) or AP (available, may return stale data during partition — like Cassandra). This DFS chooses CP: strong consistency using Raft consensus.
10 components required for this project.
| # | Component | Purpose | Qty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Go 1.21 | High-performance server implementation | x1 |
| 2 | gRPC + Protocol Buffers | Efficient inter-node communication | x1 |
| 3 | Raft consensus library (etcd raft) | Distributed consensus and leader election | x1 |
| 4 | LevelDB (go-leveldb) | Local persistent storage on each node | x1 |
| 5 | Docker + Docker Compose | Multi-node cluster simulation | x1 |
| 6 | Kubernetes (optional) | Production cluster management | x1 |
| 7 | Prometheus + Grafana | Cluster health monitoring | x1 |
| 8 | Chaos Monkey (pumba) | Fault injection for resilience testing | x1 |
| 9 | Python client SDK | Client library for DFS access | x1 |
| 10 | MinIO (reference) | Comparison with production distributed storage | x1 |
Follow these 4 steps carefully.
CAP Theorem: distributed systems can guarantee at most two of: Consistency (all nodes see same data), Availability (system responds to all requests), Partition tolerance (continues despite network splits). Network partitions are inevitable in distributed systems, so choose CP (consistent, may refuse requests during partition — like ZooKeeper) or AP (available, may return stale data during partition — like Cassandra). This DFS chooses CP: strong consistency using Raft consensus.
Raft provides distributed consensus for replicated log. Leader election: nodes start as followers. On timeout (150–300ms random), candidate requests votes. Wins if majority votes received. Leader sends heartbeats to prevent re-elections. Log replication: client writes go to leader. Leader appends to log, sends AppendEntries RPC to followers. When majority acknowledge, leader commits entry, applies to state machine, responds to client. Failure: if leader fails, new election occurs after timeout.
Map file system operations to state machine commands: WRITE_FILE(path, data) → Raft log entry → applied to all nodes. DELETE_FILE(path) → log entry. Metadata stored in Raft-replicated log (file name, size, checksum, creation time). File data: chunked into 4MB blocks, stored locally on each node (replicated by Raft log). Small files (< 64KB): inline in log entry. Large files: stored in local LevelDB by content-hash, referenced in log.
Test with Docker: run 5-node cluster. Kill leader process → verify new leader elected within 2 seconds, cluster continues serving requests. Kill 2 of 5 nodes → cluster maintains quorum (3/5), continues. Kill 3 of 5 → no quorum, cluster halts (CP guarantee). Network partition: split into 2+3 groups → 3-node partition maintains quorum and continues, 2-node partition rejects requests. Restore network → 2-node group syncs from 3-node leader.
Core code for dfs_server.go:
Test Distributed File System by verifying each subsystem individually before full integration.
Verify power voltages, check ground connections, use serial monitor for debug.
An interactive simulator will be available here — simulate circuits and run code in-browser without hardware.